Dr. Richard Coons, a psychiatrist and an attorney, testified concerning his training in human sexuality. The State may prove its entire case by circumstantial evidence alone if it proves all the elements of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Suddenly, appellant was close behind her in the room and still was not speaking. In Hall v. State, 970 S.W.2d 137, 141 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1998, pet. Mozon v. State, 991 S.W.2d 841, 847 (Tex.Crim.App.1999) (quoting Montgomery, 810 S.W.2d at 389). If there is evidence, however, from which the jury could rationally conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant formed the intent to obtain or maintain control of the victim's property either before or during the commission of the murder, then the State has proved that the murder occurred in the course of the robbery. She was in daily and weekly contact with certain IBM coworkers across the country in the same supervisory field. See Clewis v. State, 922 S.W.2d 126, 134 (Tex.Crim.App.1996). Id. Inadmissible hearsay admitted without objection shall not be denied probative value merely because it is hearsay. Subsequently in the conversation, Barajas recalled that Holik panicked when she realized that she did not have her engagement ring and said, Oh, my God. Barajas heard retreating foot steps after Holik put the phone down. See Sharp v. State, 707 S.W.2d 611, 614 (Tex.Crim.App.1986); Williams v. State, 692 S.W.2d 671, 676 (Tex.Crim.App.1984). All rights reserved. P. 33.1. He then stated that he and his wife could return the next day. The evidence was relevant. Appellant's DNA could not be excluded from four of nine loci considered by Mills. Hearsay is a statement other than one made by the declarant while testifying at trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted. Lang v. State, 698 S.W.2d 735, 736 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1985, no. 401, 402, 403. Russo was a part-time music minister at a Bastrop church and the lead singer in a Christian band. There is no per se rule by which to determine when evidence is too remote to be admissible. Holik's wrist bore indentations showing discernible redness, indicating that her heart was still beating when the wrists were bound. 10. Matamoros v. State, 901 S.W.2d 470, 474 (Tex.Crim.App.1995); Brewer v. State, 126 S.W.3d 295, 297 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2004, pet. Dr. Ranazit Chakraborty, Director of the Center for Genome Information of the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, reviewed the findings by Mills and Nelson. 1801, 114 L.Ed.2d 297 (1991). Evid. 15. 2529, 101 L.Ed.2d 472 (1988); Crosby v. State, 750 S.W.2d 768, 780 (Tex.Crim.App.1988). Diane Holik was murdered, in her own home where she lived alone, by strangulation with a ligature, and her body was left in a locked house. Appellant calls attention to certain words and phrases lifted out of context in the individual testimony. Barajas, from Los Angeles, California, testified before the jury that she was an IBM coworker with Diane Holik. Alvarado, 912 S.W.2d at 207. Diane Holik was the victim of a brutal murder that took place in Austin, Texas, in 2003. ref'd). Despite the manner in which Barajas's testimony about Holik's plans was presented at the separate hearing, the prosecution made clear that it was offering the testimony under the state of mind exception to the hearsay rule. Evid. Appellant was shown to have visited the homes of Thoom Zech and Lisa Faulkner twice on November 15, 2006, as he may have done at the victim's home. Keeping in mind the particular facts of the instant case, we find no violation of the Fourth Amendment.